READ THE COLUMN THAT ACA GIVING RISE TO THIS RESPONSE
I declare my surprise, Don Gonzalo and his column is unlikely to clearly identify the details of my surprise, but I'll try.
His column lacks reliable data and arguments sustentanbles, but the worst is not that, but rather the demonstration of absolutism in trials of all kinds.
In his column could be spent with the birth rate is only valid as expression values \u200b\u200band index numbers, if this occurs within the marriage, the other is of low quality.
The "head of household" are products that were abandoned, not that they abandoned and cheated. But notwithstanding that, and its origin as a variable for you are bad and negatives suppose that this condition is perhaps, from a moral and economic value, exceeding (before and now there were women "abandoned", only now are heads of households).
The "couple" or "Marriage", are you ever wondered about the transformation changed the family said today? and what of why not have that presence, status and relevance in training?. The worst theoretical construction
exposed here - I repeat not for its substance but because of the fragility of this argument - are set out for you.
When talking about the economic crisis more than morality - because ultimately that's the opinion you stated, not censor - is because the current structure and economic system brings with it an associated value, an advantage if you will, that is related to an order given values \u200b\u200band morals. That is deception, as was finally established by the most conservative areas near the sixteenth century. You know what I mean. "Collateral Damage" I should have called. Economy
comes from moral, legal, religious, philosophical current of thought. That is why we talk over the former than the latter.
Please do not misunderstand me, as a result can understand the background of my argument and agree with me that, at least its starting point the reality is different than mine but we agree that the concept of progress - economic, social, moral etc-if now relative.
His column lacks reliable data and arguments sustentanbles, but the worst is not that, but rather the demonstration of absolutism in trials of all kinds.
In his column could be spent with the birth rate is only valid as expression values \u200b\u200band index numbers, if this occurs within the marriage, the other is of low quality.
The "head of household" are products that were abandoned, not that they abandoned and cheated. But notwithstanding that, and its origin as a variable for you are bad and negatives suppose that this condition is perhaps, from a moral and economic value, exceeding (before and now there were women "abandoned", only now are heads of households).
The "couple" or "Marriage", are you ever wondered about the transformation changed the family said today? and what of why not have that presence, status and relevance in training?. The worst theoretical construction
exposed here - I repeat not for its substance but because of the fragility of this argument - are set out for you.
When talking about the economic crisis more than morality - because ultimately that's the opinion you stated, not censor - is because the current structure and economic system brings with it an associated value, an advantage if you will, that is related to an order given values \u200b\u200band morals. That is deception, as was finally established by the most conservative areas near the sixteenth century. You know what I mean. "Collateral Damage" I should have called. Economy
comes from moral, legal, religious, philosophical current of thought. That is why we talk over the former than the latter.
Please do not misunderstand me, as a result can understand the background of my argument and agree with me that, at least its starting point the reality is different than mine but we agree that the concept of progress - economic, social, moral etc-if now relative.
Site Feed http://escritosatalivares.blogspot.com/rss.xml http://www.escritosatalivares.blogspot.com.blogspot.com/...s.blogspot. com http://escritosatalivares.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default 
0 comments:
Post a Comment