BY NICOLAS ROMO D discourse and conceptualization of television speech is part of a world of far-reaching consequences deeply. The form of the use of language in social communication, has different impacts, typical of a universal cry of unlimited scope and product technology support.
is why many times as we dwell on the news or stories in the media has a certain impact on citizenship. No less for example that the concept Femicide this absolutely ingrained in our society today. But two years ago, nobody knew.
If we say genocide, Hitler takes meaning that genocide is being made the world (The arrival of the English was one of the largest genocides in modern history), but no, Hitler wins.
The meaning and significant, reliefs and thus has profound consequences for the debate are erratic, technical and / or language that may arise from this reflection.
The signifier and signified rational recovery rests fact CIRCUMSTANCES or thing being described - Humberto Eco - which is why dwell on as they say (mean) things on TV for example, represents irrefutable what you think that particular Journalist channel or transmitting information, is not even necessary to think much about it to find out. A timeless example of the nineties "dictatorship, coup or military takeover."
Then I stopped in a repetitive concept of individual television channels which fall every one of them, a signifier that is not in accordance with its meaning and every one of us, we accept without compunction. Product even kill a human being driving while intoxicated is a crime - Offenders - and therefore commits a Crime - Criminal.
If we have taken so long to learn the femicide as a concept, we should stop saying: The driver Drunk driving or show the driver in a drunken state, he that drunk driving is a crime and KILL SOMEONE THAT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE, THE NOTICE MUST BE RELATED:
The offender .. ....... committed his crime at the intersection of Pocuro with Pedro de Valdivia. (
Set and mean that drunk driving is a crime and its perpetrator is a criminal, we can put in their Hustad as fact. Now, if we think, is that maybe many of us have offenders, have been (yet) committed a crime on the streets of the city. would understand then why we do not mean the act as such.
we would be AUTOCRIMINANDO
Site Feed http://escritosatalivares.blogspot.com/rss.xml http://www.escritosatalivares.blogspot.com.blogspot .com / ...s.blogspot.com http://escritosatalivares.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default 
0 comments:
Post a Comment